Are Bitcoiners so homogeneous in their views that this question even makes sense?
Bitcoiners, the population of the singular and homogeneous "Bitcoin community" do not agree on everything, or even, given the breadth of utility of bitcoin, very much at all.
And that's why bitcoin is great. It doesn't care.
So if you have concerns about the El Salvador situation, feel free to express them. But don't try and attribute them to all of some made up group.
Thanks. That really makes it better. I agree there is no one homogeneous group of Bitcoiners. There isn't even a homogenous set of opinions in most humans - and that is not a bad thing.
I just think we haven't really talked about it as Bitcoiners. And there are at least two sides to the coin. Worth discussing.
reply
I just think we haven't really talked about it as Bitcoiners.
I appreciate your gratitude, but would have preferred your attention to the point being made more. No, there isn't a set of homogenous opinions in the even larger identity group of "most humans." Noone expects there would be. The delusion is thinking there is an homogenous "Bitcoin community," that shares a wide set of views. We don't.
"as Bitcoiners," and how, pray, is that? Who are the Bitcoiners, and when they disagree, who are the true Bitcoiners? And who decides?