all of my points still stand. Plus I don't think anyone linked in your vids refute them either.
e cash is a rug waiting to happen
reply
Only one mint at a time. But also, that's not the efficient way to steal with a mint. You can just print yourself money and keep it going.
reply
yes, develop trust at a mint then run it quietly at a fraction of reserves for a long long time in secret
reply
What is the most trusted mint? Is there a directory anywhere?
reply
Wouldn't put any sort of trust in a mint right now. We're still very early days for eCash on Bitcoin. If you want to play around with Cashu (knowing the chance of losing funds is there) I suggest Minibits or Enuts
reply
Lyn talks a bit about ways that mints could be audited (to some degree). It's an evolving topic.
Would also say a fedimint with multiple guardians isnt 100℅ centralized. Centralization is a spectrum, removing a single point of failure is a reduction in centralization IMO. It's still far more centralized than Bitcoin, but there's tradeoffs (good and bad)
reply
Yes but it's 100 percent custodial.
reply
Yes. Anyone claiming it's not is a red flag IMO. But custodial and centralized are 2 separate considerations
reply