You have no idea what you are talking about. Read this. It's the fucking commie paper NYT!

'The New York Times reports on America's secret war against Russia since the Maidan in 2014 (via Prof. Glenn Diesen): On the eve of the U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine (Feb. 24, 2014), the new spy chief of the U.S.-installed government in Kiev "called the CIA station chief and the local head of MI6 ... and proposed a three-way partnership." The partnership "was not created by the war" as it "took root a decade ago". Since the coup, Ukraine's intelligence services have become "Washington's most important intelligence partners against the Kremlin". "A CIA-backed network of spy bases has been built up over the past eight years and includes 12 secret locations along the Russian border." Secret bases "fully funded and partially equipped by the CIA" have been established. "Around 2016, the CIA began training an elite Ukrainian commando force - known as Unit 2245 - that captured Russian drones and communications equipment so CIA technicians could analyze them and crack Moscow's encryption systems." This first installment contained secrets about the Russian Navy's Northern Fleet, including detailed information about the latest Russian nuclear submarine designs. Soon teams of CIA officers were regularly leaving his office with backpacks full of documents."...

Ukrainians wanted European membership, but are they willing to sacrifice tens (or hundreds) of thousands of dead and wounded for that ? Even if maybe that same Europe doesn't even want them on account of the extremely high level of corruption ? Are they willing to risk their sovereignty for that ? Because it sure seems that Ukrain was no match for Russia (without foreign aid).

I understand wanting EU or NATO membership, but I also understand Ukrain is neighbor to a dictatorial regime with the second strongest military in the world. A regime that doesn't want NATO next to them. In that context, you should tread very carefully as a country.

Compare this to e.g. Poor Little Belgium in WW1. Belgium was neutral and got invaded nevertheless, with lots of foreign support as a result. Today, Ukrain was not a neutral country. They challenged the Russian bear by flirting with the EU and NATO. I can understand you want to join these, but then they should also understand the major risks involved.

In this context, I think it's only reasonable to question further aid and aim for a diplomatic resolution to end this senseless war.

Ukrain leadership gambled and lost against a ruthless dictator, with a tremendous loss of life as a result.

who says that the majority of Ukrainians want this war to continue? i would have liked to see that.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Read this. It's the fucking commie paper NYT!

'The New York Times reports on America's secret war against Russia since the Maidan in 2014 (via Prof. Glenn Diesen): On the eve of the U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine (Feb. 24, 2014), the new spy chief of the U.S.-installed government in Kiev "called the CIA station chief and the local head of MI6 ... and proposed a three-way partnership." The partnership "was not created by the war" as it "took root a decade ago". Since the coup, Ukraine's intelligence services have become "Washington's most important intelligence partners against the Kremlin". "A CIA-backed network of spy bases has been built up over the past eight years and includes 12 secret locations along the Russian border." Secret bases "fully funded and partially equipped by the CIA" have been established. "Around 2016, the CIA began training an elite Ukrainian commando force - known as Unit 2245 - that captured Russian drones and communications equipment so CIA technicians could analyze them and crack Moscow's encryption systems." This first installment contained secrets about the Russian Navy's Northern Fleet, including detailed information about the latest Russian nuclear submarine designs. Soon teams of CIA officers were regularly leaving his office with backpacks full of documents."...