pull down to refresh
76 sats \ 7 replies \ @carlosfandango 2 Mar \ on: Books And Articles Newsletter, Issue 5 BooksAndArticles
As ever, a great summing up. Haven’t been around much so good to have this as a rundown. Thank you!
Thanks. I hope all is well. I'm approaching SN overload again. Time for a break. Completely off topic- have you watched the old Hunchback Of Notre Dame with Charles Laughton and Maureen O'Hara? I'm sure you have, but I just saw it for the first time. It holds up pretty well for such an old movie.
reply
Beautiful movie and looks amazing even today. I think they tried to colorise and rerelease it but I have only seen the B&W.
And I think the actor Peter Lorre, a very versatile actor in his day, was in the running to play the hunchback originally (but that may be a Hollywood tall tale).
reply
And Laughton's makeup looks damn good for the time. I got completely engrossed in it immediately.
reply
It really does. I think it comes from a theatrical tradition of make up defining the character rather than the later style of being just a prop (made worse by poor quality tv).
You should compare the film to the Claude Rains portrayal of Phantom of the Opera.
reply
Another one I've never seen. Thanks for the recommendation.
reply
I’m not saying it is as good. But cleanses the pallete of the Lloyd-Webber version at least…
reply
I saw it on Broadway years ago. That's it. Never saw the Andrew Lloyd Webber version either. I'm more interested in the old one.
reply