pull down to refresh

at some point people decided that they should have Global Elections and choose their New Leaders to represent them on the Global Scale. since this was an unprecedented event they decided that new rules must govern this type of election. so they inscribed it that each citizen of a country must vote for one candidate from another country, and against one other. so as an example a citizen from country x would vote for a candidate from country y, and against candidate z which also is from another country beside the one on whom behalf he is voting. now the list of candidates is made up of all types of persons singers, actors, politicians, businessman and so further. so the list is big, really big since we are talking about Global Elections. then again as another rule they decided that this vote could be changed or modified only on a daily base if the voter so choose. this is all I could think up so far. how do you think the two lists would look and how would you cast your vote? remember one vote for someone and one vote against someone else but neither is from your own country
this territory is moderated
I don’t agree with your premise. Supranational organisations are fiat minded and centralist.
Look to the following as to the future; The Zapatista communities in Chiapas, Mexico. Rojava in northern Syria. The Marinaleda commune in Spain. The Cherán community in Mexico.
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
With a few modifications I think it could actually result in something better than what we have - but not without sacrificing national and individual sovereignty, which is a non-starter.
It might work well for an advisory committee that has no authority whatsoever, but just can't trust the politicians who would be voted in by the people to stay in their lane and not seek additional, further power.
Additionally, allowing a vote in the first place, much less for a global heirarchical authority, even in the best of implementations, would still be assuming unassumables - such as that it would not be gamed, and that identities can be verified with respect to human rights using currently accepted technologies.
If it were possible (it's not) to count votes properly and allow only one per human and have the vote not be cheated, (again, not possible) I would add the idea that all people with zero or one votes are eliminated after the first round, and the second round everyone votes again, only among those that had received 2 or more in the round prior.
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.