pull down to refresh

175 sats \ 4 replies \ @oliverweiss OP 2 Mar \ parent \ on: Sexism in academia is bad for science and a waste of public funding charts_and_numbers
Indeed!
I don’t quite agree with the statement that the money invested into education and training is wasted money. I am pretty sure it will be paid back in one form or another.
write
preview
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 3 Mar
The headline is misleading. The article or chart doesn’t say which academic fields. We don’t know if the departments were scientific
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @oliverweiss OP 3 Mar
The headline is the title of the Nature paper. I guess, it provides more information. Unfortunately I don’t have access to it.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 3 Mar
The chart is about Europe but the press release discusses USA
Is every academic a scientist?
Are we discussing natural science?
I would assume so if it’s Nature magazine
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 2 Mar
Seems like the comment you were responding to was hidden. Maybe coz it looks AI-generated and/or generic. I didn't see you made the same comment as I did just now.
reply