420 sats \ 14 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Mar \ on: DISCUSS: ETH is more decentralized than BTC when it comes to client diversity bitcoin
I have a simple rule that kept me away all these 10+ years from the shit: NEVER DEBATE WITH SHITCOINERS.
It is wasting time to debate, compare, discuss about BTC vs x shitcoin.
If you play with shit, you smell like shit.
Forget the ETH people then: what is your opinion about multiple implantations of bitcoin? Would you run knots instead of core?
reply
I already run btcd instead of core.
I already run neutrino also.
Only noobs think that only one core client exist.
Yes, more clients is better. Like wallets. You cannot have one with all the features you like.
LET THE MARKET TO CHOOSE.
reply
It seems like the market has chosen Core overwhelmingly.
Maybe I should take solace in the fact that people are running a pretty wide array of Core releases. I'm still running 0.21. Do you think previous releases count as client diversity?
reply
Market can't choose when all those RPi bundles come straight with Core.
Education is key in this matter, but most of new users do not read documentation or pay attention to details.
I'm still running 0.21
You should run at least 0.21.1 that have taproot activation.
Then also you should take in consideration v0.24 that have full RBF.
previous releases count as client diversity?
No, those are just other versions that do not include more features, that's all.
reply
Good point about 24. I have been meaning to update to that.
reply
Now, can we go back to memes?
ššš
reply
reply
Doesn't have to end. You have an opinion on this?
Are we just dealing with an education issue?
reply
But why force choked? Was nothing wrong with his question.
OP asked me about using different bitcoin clients. No big deal.
I replied with a joke because I like jokes and I think he understand jokes too.
reply
I do like jokes! And any conversation with Darth is bound to be enlightening.
No! More clients = Bad!
Satoshi warned us of this!
Lock step!
reply