Above the scroll
  • I prefer version A because it's simple and I think AI art used in B is already dated
Explore section/ page
  • I prefer version Neither because each has a bunch of irrelevant metadata. Metadata is useful when I'm comparing several similar things, but when I'm "exploring" I'm looking for something interesting not comparing their merits like I do when searching.
Benefits section
  • I prefer version B because I ignore anything in those square, stock marketing cards
Elements:
  • Footer:
    • One thing i like/ dislike about the footer is... I like that everything is distinct and as expected and you're encouraging aliases ... I don't dislike anything
  • Searchbar dropdown
    • One thing i like/ dislike about the dropdown is... I like that it shows me all my search options ... I don't dislike anything
Search page
  • One thing i like/dislike about the search page is... I like that it makes me feel in control of what I'm seeing ... I dislike that it feels busy like it's struggling with visual priority
Overall:
  • My favorite part of what I saw was... the dropdown
  • One thing I hope you change this one thing in the final product: some of the copy, e.g. "search the depths of bitcoin's technical ecosystem" sounds like cliched marketing language
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @art OP 5 Mar
Thanks for the feedback!
Appreciate the nudges for improvement, while overall validating that we're on the right path.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 5 Mar
Sorry if my language is bit jerkish. I like to inhabit my rage when evaluating UI/UX and I didn't have time to mood-switch.
I think Bitcoin Search is awesome! Making the UI better is gravy.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @art OP 6 Mar
Hah, not at all.
Product feedback is a great place for catharsis
reply