Ok, I cheat, I changed the original title of the blog post by economist Robin Hanson from Why Crypto to Why Bitcoin but, I think, if we keep reading the blog with Bitcoin replacing crypto wherever it appears, the blog is still spot on.
Yes, crypto can be a hide-able store of value, and ease and speed money transfers, especially internationally. But these values were mostly there right from the start, and don’t much explain or justify the vast subsequent activities in this area. Yes, crypto also uniquely satisfies a deep widespread desire to speculate and gamble, desires widely thwarted by regulations supported by common beliefs that mere gambling is socially harmful. But the big value, I think, comes from what crypto speculation winners then do with their lives.
Crypto folks tell a distinctive type of story about the world, who they are, and how people like them get rich via crypto in a world like that. In such stories, the world is ignorant and broken, and could be much better, while these people have unique penetrating insights which let them see past the lies and conformity to bravely and in teams fight to create and pursue long-shot bets toward new kinds of tech and systems that could make for a much better world. And when people like that get rich, then in order to continue to support this sort of story, they tend to initiate, fund, and participate in long-shot bet projects to make new better tech and systems.
In addition, crypto rich tend to get rich at much younger ages than do other kinds of rich, as speculation under high crypto asset volatility creates wealth inequality much faster. So crypto folks get rich when they are still young and energetic, not set in their ways, with plenty of time to try to prove that all of their other contrarian beliefs are also based on deep insights that could plausibly enable big revolutionary changes to the world. They weren’t just lucky, you see, and they will soon prove that to you.
Crypto is not equal to Bitcoin! If someone can’t understand that they don’t get first principles and why we are even here. Read the white paper. Read about the banking crisis in 2008. That’s why Bitcoin was discovered!
reply
Yes.
Thank you very much for your correct but off topic comments and suggestions.
reply
You are missing my point. You can’t swap out words. Robin Hood s talking about crypto so 99.99% pump and dump VC ideas that don’t have real world use cases.
reply
I think, I understand you very well and agree with you. The post, as I understand it, acknowledges people who got rich in crypto, but give something back by developing things and pushing “field” forward. I think that this is also the case for bitcoiners. All I want to say.
reply
What do you mean by replacing crypto for Bitcoin. Does bitcoin stand for crypto? Or, Do you intend to make it stand for? Don't you know that's a crime here on SN? 😳
reply
No, no, and yes, I know it is illegal :) Hanson uses crypto in his essay. If he would use Bitcoin and not crypto in the text, I think, the essay would still be perfectly spot on.
reply
I like the derivative take on this post
reply
It would have been nice if he provided some examples like one of the comments did:
  • Balaji Srinivasan popularised the concept of network states (many of the early "citizens" in Prospera ZEDE are crypto builders or at least would describe themselves as crypto-adjacent)
  • Vitalik is currently working on Zuzalu, his own variation of a network state; he also funded longevity non-profits in the past
  • Brian Armstrong founded NewLimit with the goal of extending human healthspan
  • Of the 800 or so accounts I follow on Twitter, which consist almost exclusively of crypto developers and founders, 142 follow Robin Hanson
I could go on here about many more less well-known people, some of whom I know personally, who are doing extremely cool and potentially world-changing work. Be it around longevity, new governance models, public goods funding, sybil resistance/privacy preserving mechanisms to verify that you are a human being, and much more.
I'm not sure if that's a subset of who RH was referring to, but Balaji & Armstrong seem to have earned their money on the business side of "crypto" rather than being "speculation winners". Vitalik is just a smart kid with nothing better to do than create build a shit-coin casino backbone. I don't think he ever got a chance to obtain wisdom through real-world adversity, did he? What has he really risked??
reply
I am not sure either, there is however a way more rich people in bitcoin like, I don’t know, Peter McCormack, many devs, crypto maxis, the ones who got in early.
Sometimes people start out poor, and end up rich. Sometimes this is because they create real net value for the world, and sometimes this is because they gambled.
reply