Ok, I cheat, I changed the original title of the blog post by economist Robin Hanson from Why Crypto to Why Bitcoin but, I think, if we keep reading the blog with Bitcoin replacing crypto wherever it appears, the blog is still spot on.
Yes, crypto can be a hide-able store of value, and ease and speed money transfers, especially internationally. But these values were mostly there right from the start, and don’t much explain or justify the vast subsequent activities in this area. Yes, crypto also uniquely satisfies a deep widespread desire to speculate and gamble, desires widely thwarted by regulations supported by common beliefs that mere gambling is socially harmful. But the big value, I think, comes from what crypto speculation winners then do with their lives.
Crypto folks tell a distinctive type of story about the world, who they are, and how people like them get rich via crypto in a world like that. In such stories, the world is ignorant and broken, and could be much better, while these people have unique penetrating insights which let them see past the lies and conformity to bravely and in teams fight to create and pursue long-shot bets toward new kinds of tech and systems that could make for a much better world. And when people like that get rich, then in order to continue to support this sort of story, they tend to initiate, fund, and participate in long-shot bet projects to make new better tech and systems.
In addition, crypto rich tend to get rich at much younger ages than do other kinds of rich, as speculation under high crypto asset volatility creates wealth inequality much faster. So crypto folks get rich when they are still young and energetic, not set in their ways, with plenty of time to try to prove that all of their other contrarian beliefs are also based on deep insights that could plausibly enable big revolutionary changes to the world. They weren’t just lucky, you see, and they will soon prove that to you.
Crypto is not equal to Bitcoin! If someone can’t understand that they don’t get first principles and why we are even here. Read the white paper. Read about the banking crisis in 2008. That’s why Bitcoin was discovered!
Yes.
Thank you very much for your correct but off topic comments and suggestions.
You are missing my point. You can’t swap out words. Robin Hood s talking about crypto so 99.99% pump and dump VC ideas that don’t have real world use cases.
I think, I understand you very well and agree with you. The post, as I understand it, acknowledges people who got rich in crypto, but give something back by developing things and pushing “field” forward. I think that this is also the case for bitcoiners. All I want to say.
What do you mean by replacing crypto for Bitcoin. Does bitcoin stand for crypto? Or, Do you intend to make it stand for? Don't you know that's a crime here on SN? 😳
No, no, and yes, I know it is illegal :) Hanson uses crypto in his essay. If he would use Bitcoin and not crypto in the text, I think, the essay would still be perfectly spot on.
I like the derivative take on this post
It would have been nice if he provided some examples like one of the comments did:
I'm not sure if that's a subset of who RH was referring to, but Balaji & Armstrong seem to have earned their money on the business side of "crypto" rather than being "speculation winners". Vitalik is just a smart kid with nothing better to do than create build a shit-coin casino backbone. I don't think he ever got a chance to obtain wisdom through real-world adversity, did he? What has he really risked??
I am not sure either, there is however a way more rich people in bitcoin like, I don’t know, Peter McCormack, many devs, crypto maxis, the ones who got in early.