reply on: Million Sat Madness Leaderboard — #835081 \ stacker news ~oracle

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 37 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar freebie \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness Leaderboard — #835081 oracle

I know they are excluded from winning sats but are they excluded from the leaderboard? Who could possibly have an estimated over 1M sats besides k00b?

Even if it is siggy. Then who are 2 and 3.

43 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 17 Mar

I think you are right, but I would point out that whoever is in first place by definition has an estimated over 1M sat earning.

I take the estimated earnings to merely be a reflection of that rank's share of the total prize pool. It only reflects one's engagement insofar as engagement plays a role in rank.

If SN affiliated accounts don't show up on the leaderboard, then yes, there is at least one dark horse who must be a serious badass at zapping...

If you look at top posts by week or month, there aren't any unaccounted for names besides the ones already mentioned.

There are a two other people I can think of who are in hiding and who might be in the top 10, but I'm still a little puzzled.

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

I can only see two people who could be on the leaderboard. There are 3 missing and I definitely can't guess who they are. This is much more fun this way. AHAhahaha

32 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Very interesting.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 17 Mar

I think that's basically correct, but I wonder how they're excluding themselves.

One option is to just slide everyone up the rankings as you describe.

It would be more complicated if their posts, comments, and zaps are excluded. That would change where we all rank on each of the separate score components and could potentially change our rankings with respect to each other.

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 17 Mar

#468700 👀

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Wow. @Undisciplined

20 sats \ 30 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Mar

I assumed they were excluded from the leaderboard too, but I’m not certain.

The top stacker has over 1M sats because the top stacker gets 1M by being number 1, in addition to the other rewards. It’s not because the top stacker is in that much of a lead over the rest.

100 sats \ 27 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Ok fair enough. Maybe I am wrong but besides Siggy I can't figure out who it could be that I don't see listed below. Maybe scoresby but then who is in 9 and 10? Carlos?

Fun exercise.

50 sats \ 25 replies \ @carlosfandango 17 Mar

Carlos?

I’m not not posting anything this month as I don’t agree with it. Comment only - therefore i cant realistically be in the running.

20 sats \ 24 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Ok. Was just trying to identify prominent stackers who aren't visible but I guess you are out of the running.

632 sats \ 23 replies \ @carlosfandango 17 Mar

deleted by author

30 sats \ 22 replies \ @grayruby 17 Mar

I definitely could see her in the top 10 but I am not sure about top 3.

50 sats \ 21 replies \ @carlosfandango 17 Mar

Hmm. Her posts are well regarded and valuable though.

60 sats \ 18 replies \ @Coinsreporter 17 Mar

I can't be sure about top three but @Natalia is definitely in the top 10.

And, we now only need 2 more guesses to complete the top 10 list.

@Scoresby @siggy47 @Natalia @TonyGiorgio

These are hiding in the top 10.

view replies

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 17 Mar

Agree but she only has one post this month. Very active and popular in the saloon and comments though. I wonder if that's enough to reach the top though.