pull down to refresh

From 2014:

The United States and its European allies now face a choice on Ukraine. They can continue their current policy, which will exacerbate hostilities with Russia and devastate Ukraine in the process -- a scenario in which everyone would come out a loser. Or they can switch gears and work to create a prosperous but neutral Ukraine, one that does not threaten Russia and allows the West to repair its relations with Moscow. With that approach, all sides would win.

https://portside.org/2014-09-02/why-ukraine-crisis-wests-fault-liberal-delusions-provoked-putin

reply

I know he is not but at least they should try.

reply

You must think nobody has tried...

Or, you must think that negotiating with a grizzly bear is on the list of reasonable options.

reply

Nobody has tried

reply

You must have privileged information only privy to those with special access.

reply

I recommend reading or listening to John Mearsheimer.

Here is a lecture from 2015: https://youtu.be/JrMiSQAGOS4?si=WP8Hr5rtw-TS6I9I

reply

It’s common sense

You’re getting your news from the wrong sources

reply

He is open to a cease fire

reply

What is Your proposal? Escalation in the 'Neocon/British' style? What about what Pope Francis said to let these people find a solution without always intervening? Being neutral has been one of the key principles of the US long time ago until the UK/ neocons 'activated' their war machine

reply

Okay, that been haçk of a long discussion guys. You all are awesome here but do not escalate this . Stay humble, stack Sats.

reply
reply

Well, you see. My comment was just a reply to your idea that Putin is open to negotiation. I think its plain to see he is not.

I don't have to have an alternative to put forward the simple truth that Putin doesn't have a strong history of bilateral agreements with the free world. He is a strongman. He gets along best with other strongmen.

War occurs when negotiations aren't possible. War is avoided when they are. Right now there is war.

reply

Putin is open to a ceasefire

reply

Well, to me the history of the Anglo-american war complex speaks a different story (Balkans, Afghanistan, Irak 1+2, Libia etc etc). This clearly is not a peace making force.

reply

Total change of topic.

I think you're correct to a degree.

But Putin... is not open for negotiations on this war.. lets at least be realistic about that.

reply

just so you understand me correctly: i'm not a putin fan. as a libertarian i hate such systems like the plague. however, i have higher expectations of the west than what corrupt proles like biden, scholz, macron and the other scum offer us. For us it is important to destroy the propaganda wall of 'our' side, too to get a more or less neutral perspective.

reply

Agreed. I think the west is on the path to losing its way!!

I think we should destroy the propaganda wall as well!

reply

Putin is open to a ceasefire. NATO is not.

reply

A ceasefire allows Russia to rearm, retool, rest troops, and reengage when it so chooses.

Only a cuck would think that tapping out in a streetfight would be honored by the other party.

reply

This is not a street fight so please stop calling me a cuck otherwise I will reciprocate if you behave like a douche bag

Russia wants the war to end. Their goal is to fortify eastern Ukraine which is Russian speaking and supportive of Putin. After all their candidate was deposed in 2014

The west and Ukraine brought this upon themselves

reply