Does this apply generally? Like for mass killers, too? :)

This happens a lot in all domains I'm sure. In software, it's a pretty good test of whether someone is mid or not. It crops up as over focus on a tool or process or practice xyz when what really matters is writing code that works well and is easy to understand. The biggest tragedy is engineers that aren't mid end up behaving like mids because they work at large co's staffed with mids. Many xyz's in software exist to deal with mids.

I was about to send out a search party 😅 Welcome back !

Less is more !

deleted by author

Are you and I the only crazies left doing this?

Day 101's comment

deleted by author

https://i.postimg.cc/P5svWyyK/no-soup-for-you-soup.gif

deleted by author

GM 👍 😎

https://m.stacker.news/23375

What do ye mean?

Day 128 of horseposting

Horse stance: 4 minutes :))

https://m.stacker.news/23361

https://m.stacker.news/23359

Almost there now buddy

I've certainly been there.

You just made a huge jump up the leaderboard. What are you up to over there?

I really think at this point he is an attention hog. If you listen to him talk about the origin of proof of work, each time his name dropping gets more intense. Watch. In six months he will claim he invented proof of work. He's like a lot of older guys whose brains start distorting reality to make them the hero in their show. The shitcoining is to get twitter attention, or it's like Nic Carter's rich guy approach.

It’s exhausting, isn’t it?

deleted by author

I actually feel energised after watching Physical 100 Season 2 on Netflix haha

Relevant to me again. I just read a post about unplugging. I'm usually on autopilot, heading for my habitual destinations, but the low level anxiety is usually present too. I miss those vacation long unplugged stretches.

https://m.stacker.news/23353

I am still thinking which image I should use for that meme with your quote from yesterday...

https://m.stacker.news/23351

I like the idea that the system works asynchronously, so the receiver doesn't have to be online at the same time as the sender.

from the github page:

Hedgehog is a protocol for two party payment channels. Hedgehog channels are similar to lightning channels but with a few comparative benefits.

- Hedgehog channels are simpler than lightning channels
- State updates only require the sender to propose an update and the recipient to accept it
- The recipient can wait to accept a state change til they want to propose another one

The properties mentioned above allow for an improved payment experience. Using hedgehog feels similar to using an ecash protocol like cashu or fedimint, except with no server. If you have a channel with someone, you can -- without their assistance -- create a payment for them, embed it in a piece of text (think of it like a cheque), and send it to them via email or some other communication method. Then you can go offline. When they get online, they can either accept the state change (the cheque) and update their balance without your further assistance, or they can reject it. If they accept the state change (the cheque) they can even use their new balance to pay you back later by making another state change (another cheque) that builds on the previous state change (i.e. spends the cheque to make a new cheque). And they can send the new state change (the new cheque) to you even if you are still offline. Or, if they reject your state change, they can propose an alternative one and wait for you to accept that.

https://github.com/supertestnet/hedgehog

Is too early, is just a proposal.
I am just reading and waiting to see how will evolve.
People usually get too easily excited by new things.
I am more patient with "new things".

Unfortunately, that's exactly what's happening nowadays.

https://m.stacker.news/23415