300 sats \ 16 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 29 Mar \ parent \ on: Tough Questions for Libertarians 8/15 libertarian
I'm guessing she's not a libertarian purist, though. She's a good example of why I thought they had a real chance.
The corporate press turned on Johnson as soon as a report came out showing that he was taking more support from Clinton. Up until that point, he was getting lots of favorable coverage.
My wife is not political at all.
She wasn't going to even vote in that election, as she had to request a mail in ballot for citizens living abroad, and really couldn't be bothered but I suggested she should still vote. Since she didn't like Clinton or Trump I suggested she look into Johnson as an alternative since the Libertarian party seemed to be gaining some traction. She looked into him a bit and decided she would vote for him.
reply
Did your wife receive a California ballot?
I am not sure if Americans living abroad should vote.
If you live in another country you have less skin in America’s game
reply
She received California ballots for the past two elections 2016 and 2020. She no longer has a California address now though. She was using her sister's address as her US address but her sister moved to Texas in 2021. So, I guess if she is going to vote in this election she would have to register for an absentee ballot in Texas.
reply
More people leaving California!
reply
My wife's entire family except her nephew who recently got married and had a baby have moved from Cali to Texas. Her brother moved to Vegas many years ago and then she moved to Canada full time almost a decade ago. Her sister and her mom and dad moved to Texas a few years ago and after her mom passed away her other nephew moved to Texas as well to stay with my wife's dad so he wouldn't be alone.
reply
I'm all for skin-in-the-game based voting. Weightier votes for parents, spouses, property owners, etc.
reply
reply
I was thinking of it as getting an additional vote for any number of pro-social activities. A married person with kids who owns their own home and is employed would get an extra vote for each of those things.
Assuming I can count properly, that would be 4 extra votes. So, their vote would count for 5x the baseline vote every American would have.
reply
So you want to give votes not take them away. I thought you meant some kind of demerit system. Say, a married with kids, employed, homeowner over the age of 25 gets a whole vote. Then you deduct in increments from there say 1/10 of a vote for every demerit. So if I am a single, no kids, unemployed, renter, living off the welfare I get 0.5 votes.
reply
I like demerits too, but for antisocial things like currently serving a criminal sentence or being in bankruptcy or other types of default.
reply
Property owners only is my solution
reply