pull down to refresh

78 sats \ 11 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Apr \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness 2 - Is it necessary for stackers to hide their identity? meta
This doesn't change your point, because it's about optics, but the second and third place finishers can be inferred from the current rewards page. Neither ended up being hiders.
Something is screwed up with the estimated rewards and rankings algorithm.
write
preview
65 sats \ 8 replies \ @grayruby 1 Apr freebie
This doesn't change your point, because it's about optics, but the second and third place finishers can be inferred from the current rewards page. Neither ended up being hiders.
I don't know what you mean by this. I can't tell who came in 2nd or 3rd based on the current rankings. I don't see anyone with more sats than DavidW and we know he finished 4th.
reply
50 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Apr
It's not the current rankings. Our MSM rewards are included in "stacked".
Do we know davidw finished fourth? If so, 2nd and 4th can be inferred from that page.
reply
65 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 1 Apr
Looks like they are all hiding to me. I don't know how you are searching for this.
reply
65 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 1 Apr
I guess we don't know for sure but he was in fourth last night.
reply
50 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Apr
It was me! But apparently I was getting paid for past performance. Classic mistake SN.
reply
65 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 1 Apr
Ok but how do you know who 2 and 3 were?
reply
50 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Apr
Well now we know it was a glitch.
I was 2nd and davidw was 3rd.
reply
65 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 1 Apr
Oh. I thought you were 4th
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Apr
Bank error in our favor
reply on another page
60 sats \ 1 reply \ @cryotosensei 3 Apr
Did you get 3rd place? 😉
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 3 Apr
No. I got second...in February. That glitch was quite the godsend.
reply