pull down to refresh
75 sats \ 16 replies \ @frostdragon 1 Apr \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness 2 - Is it necessary for stackers to hide their identity? meta
I agree with your points in comments on this post - I think privacy is super important/essential, but I actually disagree that the whole point of bitcoin is privacy, fwiw. The public ledger is inherently not private. There are some pretty solid layer 2 solutions, but privacy isn't one of the properties that makes money sound.
Did you recieve your MSM reward? @frostdragon
reply
Not yet!
reply
Why haven't you received your MSM reward? Were you inside the 64 places?
reply
Yeah no idea, I wasn't as high as 30, but I was in the top 40 or 50. Unless something crazy happened last minute, I should have gotten a few thousand sats, but I'm guessing they're still working out the kinks.
reply
As of now I can confirm that the winners upto rank 25 have been awarded.
The breking news is this that @siggy47 was the winner.
The runnerup was @Undisciplined
reply
How did you confirm that information?
reply
I can tell you, if you confirm that you were the runner up.
reply
Confirmed. I'm not hiding though, so you can infer that from the ludicrous number of sats I've stacked already this month.
I don't know why. But I can confirm that I was half inside the top 64. At 30.