That's a good point. I haven't tried splicing for this.

In which case, I don't think there's much difference between the two in terms of cost.

> Kraken already has Lightning and I seldom use it TBH.

You do onchain withdrawals because of this inbound liquidity problem? With splicing, that shouldn't be a problem. 

Additionally, there are zero fees for LN withdrawals on Kraken unlike onchain. Not sure how that works out for them.


I'm not toooo excited... Lightning's problem is that withdrawing from an exchange already requires the in-bound liquidity, which isn't suited to the DCA model that most stackers use exchanges for. Kraken already has Lightning and I seldom use it TBH. I believe Binance does too.

I think maybe Coinbase's adoption will encourage online vendors to accept Lightning, though, which to me is a win.

bitcoin

Coinbase Selects Lightspark for Lightning

random_

It'll be interesting to see.

I'm not toooo excited... Lightning's problem is that withdrawing from an exchange already requires the in-bound liquidity, which isn't suited to the DCA model that most stackers use exchanges for. Kraken already has Lightning and I seldom use it TBH. I believe Binance does too.

I think maybe Coinbase's adoption will encourage online vendors to accept Lightning, though, which to me is a win.