The important thing is that it's a good social media site.
This of course is subjective. I like SN. Most of us that use it a lot obviously do like it and think it is good but I suspect many that have came and left would disagree. That's OK. Its subjective.
I would agree that SN is social media in the broad sense and also... so what lol. It could be bad for some people and good for others. Its very hard for any of us to say. I think the most important thing to remember about all Internet comms especially social media/forums is that it isn't real. Ideas are real but these personas we all have here even if we try to be true to ourselves aren't real. They are never going to be real. Knowing someone in the real world is different. I try to remember this when I see some of the annoying and dumb behavior on SN. Don't take it to seriously. You don't know these people and this is likely not who they really are. Few write online in ways they would speak in person face to face.
Oh yeah, everyone's got an online persona, but I'm not sure I'd say they're not inherently "real." Our online presentations are distinct from our in-person presentations, but in general they tend to be consistent and reflections of us, just within a different context. Some things can be very different (there are plenty of online assholes who are a lot less aggro in real life), but things like core values still tend to shine through.
reply
What I mean is real in the deep philosophical sense. Even in person most are not real. I really try to be authentic to myself and others but I know that I fail much of the time. The reasons are many and complex. I'm not just talking about people being a-holes. We are incentivized to present certain things and hide others. That's not real.
That's what I mean. I don't believe it is healthy to take what people post online as real. Not in the same way we trust people we know. I have my reasons for seeing things this way. It is mostly from experience.
reply