A token economy on Bitcoin launches tomorrow. \ stacker news ~bitcoin

Do you have forced closed channels that you cannot economically save under this spam load? Do you have funds in limbo because a bunch of degenerates decided to take a shit in the public park? I expect this kind of bullshit on other shitcoins.

This spam bullshit has made running LN infra an absolute nightmare in 2023. This isn’t adding anything but spam and noise, and these spamming morons are just sapping value from the system.

307 sats \ 8 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 18 Apr

Runes ?

62 sats \ 7 replies \ @nym 18 Apr

Looks like it.

90 sats \ 6 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr

100 percent Runes. Bets on how high sats per v/byte will go?

85 sats \ 5 replies \ @nym 18 Apr

90 sats v/byte for low priority

11 sats \ 4 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr

Add a zero.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @nym 20 Apr

Halfway to your prediction already!

6 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 23 Apr

The post-halving blocks were WILD as expected.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 23 Apr

For sure! You called it!

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 19 Apr

I'm sure you will be correct in the longer term.

219 sats \ 2 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr

Degens gonna degen.

115 sats \ 1 reply \ @leaf 18 Apr

People just like to graffiti. Some if it is great. Most of it is shit.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr

Art be like that.

140 sats \ 2 replies \ @BITC0IN 18 Apr

shitcoiners gonna shitcoin

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 18 Apr

Bitcoiners gonna bitcoin

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr

Spammers going to spam.

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 19 Apr

Let the great rugging of 24/25 begin and eventually get relegated to the history books only to be rebranded in 29/30 for a next rugging of even bigger proportions.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 19 Apr

Question from someone who's only used LN casually and haven't dove into the full rabbit hole first, just knowledgeable of the concepts:

Is there a difference in how different LN wallets and services handle high fees? Say custodial vs something like phoenix (splicing, single channel non-custodial) vs zeus (everything DIY) ?

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 18 Apr

Everyone knew it was possible 10 years ago, but they abandoned it because they are not brain dead. Stop spamming you barbarians.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0245bdaef2 19 Apr

sees man pissing into his own butt

Man: “Pretty crazy to think about. No one thought it was possible a year ago. Now here we are with absolute madness set to unleash tomorrow.”

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 23 Apr

A+ response sir lmao

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 19 Apr

That's why we can't have nice things: there'll always develop a pocket of idiots who think they've solved something amazing, while all they managed to do was the very thing people begged them not to.

One of the reasons that I simply despise humans; we can't let things be what they're supposed to be, everyone has to put their little ignorant "mark" onto something, destroying it in the end.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 19 Apr

Timers, timechain,

That fusion on timechain is way ahead, tomorrow is just a world full of better ideas.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @rtr 18 Apr

So. What exactly is the point of runes and tokens? Is there anything for someone not interested in the whole NFT/DeFi crap to be excited about this?

Is this just redoing what's been done on Ethereum but on Bitcoin? What is it trying to achieve?

63 sats \ 1 reply \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr

Too early to tell but probably not.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @rtr 19 Apr

That's a shame. I hope it doesn't bloat the txn fees too much for too long.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @notgeld 18 Apr

I respect runes for simplicity and merketint but "token economy" was always possible since 10 years ago.

Nowadays better to use Liquid. It has even a DeX for them.

205 sats \ 0 replies \ @JakeBlockchain OP 19 Apr

If tech mattered most, Liquid would be crushing it.