31 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 21 Apr \ on: New UFO Whistleblower Jason Sands UFOs
It's kind of sad that I can't trust any of this. I want to but there are too many motives at play and nothing pleb verifiable.
That's the nature of the beast in UFOs. It's really hard to verify things with 100% certainty. I wish they just release the craft and the biologics instead of prancing around the topic like this.
This entire UFO program is probably so compartmentalized and the material and info so chopped up into small pieces that having one or a couple that's willing to speak out publicly about it can be easily discredited. Not to mention, the apparent attempts of the USG to gaslight the witnesses and the public about this phenomena.
Just like with the NSA surveillance program before Snowden dumped all of that confidential information, this entire UFO saga will always be shrouded in doubt until someone spills the entire thing for everyone to see.
reply
Exactly, data dump > documentaries
reply
This article by the AARO director says it plainly:
In many respects, the narrative is a textbook example of circular reporting, with each person relaying what they heard, but the information often ultimately being sourced to the same small group of individuals.
We all receive heresay at this point. The pentagon's UAP videos are possibly real, but it's a far cry from claiming materials exist that could be tested but never are.
reply
We all receive heresay at this point.
That's true, I'd argue some hearsay is 'better' than others though.
One of my last acts before retiring was to sign AARO’s Historical Record Report Volume 1, which is currently being prepared for delivery to Congress and the public. The report demonstrates that many of the circulating allegations described above derive from inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of legitimate U.S. programs or related R&D that have nothing to do with extraterrestrial issues or technology. Some are misrepresentations, and some derive from pure, unsupported beliefs.
That report they released a few months ago, is rife with errors and cherry-picking according to Melon:
#504129
It's also written by ChatGPT according to me ;)
#466183
I'm sure Sean tried his best, but look at the Wilson-Davis Memo notes and remember what you would be up against trying to find information.
reply