Bunch of the wallets run lnd internally. Breez is running lnd, etc.
reply
Given the past 2 LND hard forks, you sure this is a good idea? Vigilant LND node runners were alright because they could set the timelock ahead of time to be a reasonably long time, more than enough to push an LND hot patch after coming back from vacation to a peer trying to shortchange you. This format seems much more difficult to set these safety configurations, and you'd be reliant not only on LND to push a hot patch, but for Blixt to push a hot patch before you got force closed.
I understand you can be okay with brittle software so long as you manage your risk properly, but what I'm getting at is how difficult it would be to manage the risk of this software.
reply
You are free to fork it and change it as you wish. Is FOSS
reply
That's true, it would still be a matter of should I fork this project or a better one, but you'd be missing the point if we left it like that. When I ask these questions, like man that looks difficult to manage the risk for, or why bother with muun when its basically just on-chain txs, what's at the heart of my concerns is, first for what I might find useful for myself to use, but second, what I think is worth teaching someone else how to use. Sometimes there are easier things that might be my first suggestion, but there may also be projects that I find worth my time to teach others how to use and manage later on. Thirdly, the concerns that I bring up are in regard to whether I will be suggesting to people I know to stay the hell away from. Yes its your choice and you can use what you want, but I'm looking at what should I suggest to others or warn other people about.
reply