He had an agenda. "BTC fork of Bitcoin" lol. The only problem I have running a lightning node for over two years is the database growth. So I should moderate the flow by not dropping my fees too low. The rebalancing model is of course the culprit of such an excessive traffic. I hope that Liquid dropping fees to 0.01 soon will make PeerSwap more popular.
FCs are a nuisance of course, but all are due to unreliable peers or bugs in the software, which are being gradually ironed out.
And no, a node is not a custodian of other people funds. A channel is owned by two nodes together, each one treats the other as an adversary and ready to punish for cheating.
He had an agenda. "BTC fork of Bitcoin" lol. The only problem I have running a lightning node for over two years is the database growth. So I should moderate the flow by not dropping my fees too low. The rebalancing model is of course the culprit of such an excessive traffic. I hope that Liquid dropping fees to 0.01 soon will make PeerSwap more popular.
FCs are a nuisance of course, but all are due to unreliable peers or bugs in the software, which are being gradually ironed out.
And no, a node is not a custodian of other people funds. A channel is owned by two nodes together, each one treats the other as an adversary and ready to punish for cheating.