10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 13 May
I honestly havent even seen someone talk about an "open-source" CBDC since it contradicts itself.... I mean the government wants power and control why would they let it even be open-source without it benefiting them
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @nullama 13 May
Open source simply means anyone can read the code.
The code itself can be anything.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 13 May
Again why would any government want to be that transparent? It would ruin the idea of black boxes or top secrete projects that these governments around the world fund. It would hamper anyone pouring money into a secret project to gain a cutting edge.
If you have a separate pot of money for that that isn't on the CBDC chain then again it just defetes the idea the government is pushing for.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 13 May
CBDC have always been a bad idea.
But to give them credit, they are easier to understand than bitcoin.
So its easy to trick people into using it.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Athena 13 May
Government is for the people of the people and to the people but in reality it is for itself only.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 13 May
The 'C' stands for centralised, corrupt, conspiracy, and cruel. How can it save?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 13 May
Lol always room for everyone in the great country of Chad, lets all move there with our bitcoin and be Chads
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 13 May
Of course not. They are from the government!
reply