I think it's a fairly bipartisan thing to want the banking system to take hold of custodied assets, probably the least controversial thing politically to show some support for "crypto".

There's two fights in here:

1- Getting politicians to realize Bitcoin is different from "crypto" and "blockchain". A lot of them are running around and using these terms interchangeably.

2- Once the custody battles are won, getting politicians to really push executive-level policy that basically leaves self-custody/privacy-preservation largely alone, if not enshrining actual protections.