"America" is pro whatever enriches the donor class. Paper bitcoin seems to have entered that category, but I wouldn't expect that to extend to P2P bitcoin, necessarily.

This is presented as a pro-bitcoin bill, but it looks like there's some crazy restrictions in there. For instance, you can't buy digital assets for more than the greater of 10% of your net worth or 10% of your annual income.

From here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4763/text?s=1&r=1&q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22Financial+Innovation+and+Technology+for+the+21st+Century+Act.%22%5D%7D

“(B) with respect to a transaction involving the purchase of units of a digital asset by a person who is not an accredited investor, the aggregate amount of all units of digital assets purchased by such person during the 12-month period preceding the date of such transaction, including the unit of a digital asset purchased in such transaction, does not exceed the greater of—

“(i) 10 percent of the person’s annual income or joint income with that person’s spouse or spousal equivalent; or

“(ii) 10 percent of the person’s net worth or joint net worth with the person’s spouse or spousal equivalent;

I hope so. Once America moves, the UK tends to follow.

America was founded on libertarian principles so America would be pro Bitcoin from the start. What we deal with instead is a fork throwing the basic principles out of the window: America Cash.

Democrats vote in favor for elections, they could change their minds after that.