I don't think there is any questions remains about zaprank. I will lovingly submit my content there. I must say I was a little stressed when I first found out the dramatic zaprank miscalculation.
But now I'm happy that content shall be judged by the best stacker on SN who I follow and like whom I want to become.
If I can suggest, I want to say that it would be better if we have 2 permanent judges and 3 or 5 temporary or weekly judges for the content and also for the evaluation of content we have an open discussion post running throughout the week. Or it can be that all judges weight the content of Stackers on the competition post.
Hope you understood my point.
Whoa! Somebody bombed at me with 10k sats! Thank you so much!!!
reply
feels good
reply
Yeah, wtf.
reply
If I can suggest, I want to say that it would be better if we have 2 permanent judges and 3 or 5 temporary or weekly judges for the content and also for the evaluation of content we have an open discussion post running throughout the week. Or it can be that all judges weight the content of Stackers on the competition post.
SN's the main "judge"; siggy and me are simply there to fill the gap and point a finger if need be, or make a call if multiple submissions are too close together in terms of "ranking". 🙂
reply
I think you make some great suggestions. To be honest, I think @Fabs and I are still nervous there won't be much interest. If this thing gets big enough I have no problem having more judges. I can't speak for @Fabs. Let's see how week 1 goes.
reply
I'll let you be the "judge" about that... 🌝🤭.
reply