I think the part that I wasn't expecting here was "you can have entanglement even if quantum theory is false."
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
52 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 5 Jun 2024
It's kinda implied in this article, but worth emphasizing that quantum entanglement doesn't mean information can be transferred at a speed greater than the speed of light. If you are measuring the state of entagled particle B, you would still need to check the state of particle A by obtaining it through "classical" means, i.e. someone at particle A would need to inform you of its state, whose communication means are bound by the speed of light.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Jun 2024
Exactly. I never quite understood the supposed paradox here.
Logical inference in one place about something happening in another is not the same thing as communication between the two places.
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 4 Jun 2024
Very interesting. Thanks for posting. Quantum physics baffles me but @Undisciplined fancies himself somewhat of a quantum physicist.
reply
0 new comment
71 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Jun 2024
Indeed
https://m.stacker.news/33938
reply
0 new comment
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears OP 5 Jun 2024
Yeah, Quantum physics also baffles me, but I find it fascinating and which I could understand more of it.
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 5 Jun 2024
Me too.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BoJack 5 Jun 2024
From a dumb peasant such as myself I think life is rendered and entanglement is just the beginning in understanding our rendering speed
reply
0 new comment