I mean yeah, "all models are wrong, some are useful". There is little doubt stock to flow is a fundamental influencing price and we'll eventually hit 500k, but this prediction model is just wrong. By PlanB's own criteria. But instead of admitting it and saying oh well this didn't work out but my gut feeling is still this price tag, he's just falsifying evidence on how the model was always on track and that is what I don't like.
I can understand that.
reply