Well done! I use Blink and Speed wallets for small amounts of BTC. They are custodial but easy to use and worth getting to know.
Blink requires phone number which is light-KYC and Speed is even worse
reply
I also thought like that, but you can click the "use email instead" and don't provide phone number. You can also delete the number from existing account if you have an email added but I suppose they gonna store it on the server anyway, but give it a try
reply
Okay, I will give it a try .
reply
Blink does not require a phone verification but without it you're stuck at "account level zero" and limited to $150 withdrawals and payments per day.
reply
hhhmm... I would like one without kyc.
reply
Try Wallet of Satoshi perhaps. It’s popular and has been around for a while. No KYC.
reply
Didnt wallet of satoshi just have something happen?
reply
It blocks access coming from US IP, same as Phoenix, Blink & ZBD
reply
Right right. No US access.
reply
I will have to take a look at it. Is it easier and anonymous?
reply
Blink uses your mobile number to back up so not really. Speed uses an email address. Aqua is completely anonymous but slightly more complicated. Worth a look though.
reply
hmm, not sure if I'd trust Aqua.
reply
Aqua sounds like a winner. Does it do the splicing service?
reply
No, it's Liquid wallet attached to Boltz to stimulate LN experience. In another words : it does not support LN by native
reply
okay, maybe I will have to try another one.
reply