177 sats \ 14 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 14 Jun \ parent \ on: This Day in Stacker News: June the 14th meta
It would be awesome if some of these older posts get some fresh engagement.
Maybe I should be leaving congratulatory comments.
write
preview
42 sats \ 12 replies \ @grayruby 14 Jun
I get a bit paranoid when people zap my old posts. "Did the algo recommend this under one of my other posts or are you stalking me?". Haha
reply
111 sats \ 8 replies \ @Bell_curve 14 Jun
Sometimes I zap old posts that are in the similar topics section
reply
62 sats \ 6 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jun
You don’t do just that. You write Wikipedia-like articles haha
reply
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 15 Jun
Yes his sourcing has been impressive.
reply
41 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 15 Jun
I try to choose credible sources but I am also biased
reply
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 15 Jun
That’s about the most human statement I’ve ever heard.
reply
41 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 14 Jun
Yeah, he's really kicked it up a notch with all the sources and footnotes. It's very distinctive.
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 15 Jun
Thanks
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 15 Jun
Occasionally
I prefer to have one liners
You’re too kind
reply
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 14 Jun
Good man
reply
41 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 14 Jun
I always wonder about it, too. I think people are just exploring in different ways and sometimes they find something old.
It is odd that it's more often zaps than comments.
reply
112 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 14 Jun
When it is something popular I posted I don't think much of it, I assume the algo recommended it, someone read it and zapped but when it is something really random I must ask: pourquoi?
reply
72 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jun
Understood. Next time when I zap one of your old posts or comments, I will leave a note to explain how I dropped by haha
reply
188 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 14 Jun
deleted by author
reply