Read the previous edition here.
Added back post titles for top comments

June 18th, 2023 šŸ“…


šŸ“ TOP POST

Everyone is kind to share everything. When i ask for something everyone is sharing their knowledge. Thank you so much everyone.
2213 sats \ 18 comments \ @OpenMind \ ~bitcoin

šŸ’¬ TOP COMMENT

Excerpt:
Create a large scale open-source project and back it behind an organisation/company similar to the AOSP, Ubuntu or Sourcehut business model. Initially start as a project for other devices to reduce cost and achieve funds, and eventually work with an OEM to manufacture a hardware device for that with said funds.
2146 sats \ 0 replies \ @final \ ~bitcoin

šŸ† TOP STACKER

2nd Place: @mudbloodvonfrei (1st place presumed to be @siggy47)
3324 stacked \ 489 spent \ 4 posts \ 28 comments \ 0 referrals

June 18th, 2022 šŸ“…


šŸ“ TOP POST

1653 sats \ 22 comments \ @k00b \ ~bitcoin

šŸ’¬ TOP COMMENT

I think that Exchanges are the biggest centralization risk right now, people are waking up to the fact that id you are not self sovereign you don't actually own you bitcoin
153 sats \ 2 replies \ @EnormousPony \ ~bitcoin

šŸ† TOP STACKER

2375 stacked \ 8702 spent \ 9 posts \ 13 comments \ 0 referrals

June 18th, 2021 šŸ“…


šŸ“ TOP POST

10 sats \ 221 boost \ 3 comments \ @lylepratt \ ~bitcoin

šŸ’¬ TOP COMMENT

From [blockchain.com wallet (finally) supports native segwit)(#60)
I wonder how much of the mempool clearing is related to this.
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @lylepratt \ ~bitcoin

šŸ† TOP STACKER

EMPTY
Has anyone responded to you yet when you reply to the post/comment advising it is the top one from x year(s) ago?
reply
Yes, @felipe chatted with me and @cryotosensei a bit.
It does kind of bum me out seeing all these early stackers who aren't active anymore.
reply
Yes, I wonder if early stackers left because there wasn't much going on at the time and they lost interest. It would be great if some early stackers who aren't active anymore came back now to see their reaction to how the site and community has grown and changed.
reply
Maybe so. I do remember there being quite a bit of pushback against territories. You may have driven some of them away when you emerged victorious in that battle.
reply
Yes, I recall there were some who did not approve of the SN fork.
reply
Lots of people end up losing their login credentials and creating new accounts too.
reply
SN had a fork!!
Soft or hard?
reply
Hard fork. Big subbers won.
reply
Was it a hard fork? I think a lot of the opponents just muted all the new content and carried on like nothing ever happened.
I guess it's still a hard fork, but they're pretending like it wasn't.
Finally, top post reaches yo 10 sats with 221 in boost. Those days, stackers were very frugal.
reply
It was only about a year ago that zaps started getting a lot bigger. I remember several discussions about it when I was fairly new to SN.
reply
Gone are the days where we could make thousands of sats with literally 3 sentences haha
reply
That's a bit defeatist. I'm sure someone could still do that, if they really made them count.
It might be a fun challenge.
reply
I agree with @EnormousPony's top comment. Is there an even greater risk after two years?
reply
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 18 Jun
I have loved reading these posts the last few days! It is amazing to see what was talked about and popular a few years ago and compare it to what is going on now!
reply
It's really interesting. A year ago, people were still asking if it was ok to talk about stuff other than Bitcoin.
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 18 Jun
That is pretty wild! I have only been around a few months and I love that while I can get great Bitcoin insight and news here that there is another side that also is thriving that does not deal with BTC at all and shares pictures of their animals!
reply