79 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Jun \ parent \ on: This Day in Stacker News: June the 18th meta
Yes, @felipe chatted with me and @cryotosensei a bit.
It does kind of bum me out seeing all these early stackers who aren't active anymore.
write
preview
42 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun
Yes, I wonder if early stackers left because there wasn't much going on at the time and they lost interest. It would be great if some early stackers who aren't active anymore came back now to see their reaction to how the site and community has grown and changed.
reply
50 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Jun
Maybe so. I do remember there being quite a bit of pushback against territories. You may have driven some of them away when you emerged victorious in that battle.
reply
53 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun
Yes, I recall there were some who did not approve of the SN fork.
reply
92 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 Jun
Lots of people end up losing their login credentials and creating new accounts too.
reply
61 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 18 Jun
SN had a fork!!
Soft or hard?
reply
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun freebie
Hard fork. Big subbers won.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Jun
Was it a hard fork? I think a lot of the opponents just muted all the new content and carried on like nothing ever happened.
I guess it's still a hard fork, but they're pretending like it wasn't.
reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun
Yes, they can simulate backwards compatibility by muting everything that was post the fork but they can't really run the pre-fork SN.
reply
71 sats \ 0 replies \ @felipe 18 Jun
@grayruby @Undisciplined
šŸ‘€
reply