I have posted about these ideas and products before with BTC L2's being used to tokenize and trade things and here is yet another example. I feel though that something like US Treasuries are just begging for an issue to transpire. I mean you are literally playing with the Treasury and Fed's baby...
pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln 5 Jul
I stopped reading here. Stacks is NOT a Bitcoin layer-2 solution. It's an affinity scam by a shitcoin company.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Cje95 OP 5 Jul
Hate to be that person but you have to idk read a little bit. Cause literally the words after are
Core and BoB (Build on Bitcoin) Bitcoin layer-2 solutions.
Those doesn't count? Pretty soon you can eliminate them all. This isn't just one its freaking multiple.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 5 Jul
According to my definition, they also do not count.
Core, from CoreDao uses what they call
I do not care for Proof of Stake, hence I stopped reading.
I don't know about BoB, but the website raises similar keywords that I make I cannot consider these to be Bitcoin layer 2.
For me, an L2:
- does not creates its own token
- fully relies on Bitcoin's POW
- does not need to bridge to ETH to use their smart contract abilities
- does not give power to the biggest bags through POS
Currently, only LN qualifies as an L2 to me. Arguably projects such as RGB and Taro. Maybe projects like ARK in the future...
It's all fine that they do. I just stated that I stopped reading here, in the same way I would not go reading an ETH forum or a Stacks telegram group. I'm ok with them issues US Treasuries.
reply