pull down to refresh
188 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 14 Jul
Best to focus on nostr. These guys lost the plot. I emailed them months ago trying to convince them crypto was the wrong path and to focus on bitcoin/lightning, pointed out successful projects like SN, fountain, gaming apps, nostr. They were quite polite in their response thanking me for my opinion though.
reply
108 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 14 Jul
Yeah, I totally buy that X and Reddit are pulling up stakes to move to their new environment. I could see ZH or Drudge essentially syndicating content to them, but that's where it ends.
As others have said, I'd rather see a Nostr-centric approach.
reply
76 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 14 Jul
I want to ask.
Can we use Odysee as a proper alternative of YouTube? Can we earn by uploading new videos there?
reply
313 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 14 Jul
- bitchute
- rumble
reply
72 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Jul
On one hand, I like the direction of their changes. On the other, something built on nostr that has bitcoin payments is probably going to win out.
reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 14 Jul
Thanks! I've just explored the platform. It looks cool!
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatsMate 14 Jul
I think they are finding more money in the path of "crypto" and "blockchain". I don't blame people for finding a pathway for a successful businesses, but they should have at least explored the possibility.
reply
54 sats \ 3 replies \ @guts 14 Jul
The future of decentralized video should not be gatekept on Bitcoin
reply
8 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 14 Jul
Chances are if it’s not on bitcoin or nostr it is a decentralization larp.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @guts 15 Jul
I disagree, is Matrix decentralization larp?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 15 Jul
Don’t know enough to comment but I have seen enough “crypto”, “blockchain”, “web 3” projects that are most certainly larping as being decentralized to be comfortable with my “chances are” statement. I didn’t say most certainly are. I said chances are.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 14 Jul
Note, Arweave offers '200 years or as long as the endowment allows' for their funding model for storage. Their endowment is AR tokens, which they print themselves, from nothing. Payment for storage goes back into their endowment.
The tokens are a one time payment for storage, so users are less likely to need them over time.
Every time I read about Arweave I cannot understand how it can work sustainably, and a 200 year storage project -- while ambitious -- cannot live on shittokens alone.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave 15 Jul
Ew.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinAbhi 15 Jul
deleted by author
reply