53 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Jul \ parent \ on: Punishment is a Public Good econ
When you talk about incentivizing downzapping, do you realise that it will then be used much similar to zapping now! Some Stackers will even choose to downzap what they personally don't like. The echo chamber you talk about may lead us to a full blown war between zappers and downzappers.
write
preview
11 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Jul
I hadn’t thought about that sort of escalation, but I know it’s very important to not screw up the incentives.
reply
32 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Jul
Not trying to object to your views but incentivising punishment may lead to manipulation of rewards by some of us who would more often downzap in order to reward themselves!
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Jul
It's a balancing act to make punishment worth doing, without making it lucrative.
I think there are ways to limit the benefits of downzapping, to keep it from getting out of control.
reply
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Jul
Yes, that's what I'm trying to hold. We need to be very careful while implementing any sort of punishment incentives.
  1. Downzapping should not impact leaderboard rankings at all.
  2. Downzapping shouldn't increase the trust score.
  3. Any downzapping to good content should have negative impact on a Stacker's trust value.
I mean that while implementing incentives for downzapping, it should be properly thought about any repercussions.
reply