pull down to refresh
26 sats \ 1 reply \ @guts 25 Jul
By Telegraph...
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @fm 25 Jul
Hehehe, exactly..
The Barclay brothers are really known by being factual ๐
reply
21 sats \ 20 replies \ @fm 25 Jul
propaganda..
Francis host of our daily podcast 'Ukraine: The Latest',.. No surprise
reply
66 sats \ 19 replies \ @kristapsk OP 25 Jul
These are facts. Russia is having demographic crisis since 1990s already and now on top of that big amount of people at reproductive age are dying in front lines. War strategy of Russia haven't changed since 18th century, they haven't adopted modern tactics, still rely on masses.
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @fm 25 Jul
Image if they adopt modern tactics then..
reply
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @kristapsk OP 25 Jul
They wont. That would involve low level commanders doing independent decisions. That's not their style, as dictatorship will fail then. Modern warfare started with Carl von Clausewitz "On War". Germans started it with Second and Third Reich, then Amercians and NATO adopted and improved on that, then Ukraine surprised Russians by having adopted it too.
Also, there are big industrial problems with their manufacturing. Their factories rely on Western tech to produce tanks, etc. Sooner or later they will start to fail. As Russians don't have their own tech for that.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @fm 25 Jul
Plus, we add Kamala as Commander in chief then we are sure those pesky Russians are destroyed again for more 30 years.
Then USA will definitely stop buying Rusian engines and start to manufacture themselves
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk OP 25 Jul
Kamala will not be Commander, I'm pretty sure of that.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
Could go either way, Trump could pull some stupid irreversible %$%.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
If they adopt technology, it can be turned on itself.
Putin will never let that happen, he loves his power.
reply
7 sats \ 11 replies \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
Russia can go nuclear
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
It already has...look at chernobyl.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @kristapsk OP 25 Jul
Yes, they can. And then it's 100% sure Russia will lose. Is it 100% sure NATO will lose? Don't think so, as they can track Russian missile launch systems pretty well. Have some info on their capabilities from friends who worked on some projects that weren't officially military, but American tracking skills in real time for the stuff on the ground are impressive.
Will generals in Russian army be ok to do this? Don't think so, as they don't want to lose everything they already have just because of ambitions of one imperialist madman.
reply
21 sats \ 8 replies \ @fm 25 Jul
Can you imagine ๐
reply
7 sats \ 7 replies \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
If we keep poking the bear and Putin
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
Are you talking about the pooh bear?
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
Canโt poke Pooh bear
Winnie is Taoist
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
Mao Zhedong was buddhist.
Doesnt mean much.
reply on another page
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
lol
Russian bear
what is mascot for Russia?
reply
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
lol
I thought you were insinuating about china and its leader.
https://m.stacker.news/41669
view replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
Seems like the mass tactic is working so far....
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
Wasnt Putin unhealthy for the longest time?
Bathing in elk blood and stuff?
reply