pull down to refresh

43 sats \ 7 replies \ @Satosora 7 Aug \ parent \ on: The End Of The Chevron Era news
Is that what it is? Maybe I read the article wrong, I thought they were interpreting laws the way it suits them.
write
preview
this territory is moderated
41 sats \ 6 replies \ @siggy47 OP 7 Aug
In the US courts have the role of interpreting laws. The Chevron case granted that judicial authority to administrative agencies. This decision corrects that longstanding error, in my opinion.
reply
43 sats \ 5 replies \ @Satosora 7 Aug
I realize they have a role in interpreting the law. Even when this error is corrected, what happens when the law is interpreted in a way that isnt right? Im sure it is only a matter of time before that happens. Or maybe I am just paranoid?
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 7 Aug
Federal administrative agencies abused a power they never should have been given in 1984 by Supreme Court, majority opinion written by Stevens
reply
41 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 OP 7 Aug
@Bell_curve nailed it. Only courts have the power to interpret law.
reply
64 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 7 Aug
@Bell_curve = @siggy47 ? OMG haha
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 7 Aug
omg, not this again lol
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 7 Aug
I listen to Law Talk podcast with Epstein and Yoo
I also took one semester of Constitutional Law in college
I consider myself an expert, an armchair legal scholar
reply