reply on: SN release: autowithdraw fixes. Trouble with attached wallets? Ask here! \ stacker news ~meta

151 sats \ 10 replies \ @fed 17 Aug \ parent \ on: SN release: autowithdraw fixes. Trouble with attached wallets? Ask here! meta

Lnbits using PhoenixD. Here is the invoice it is giving.

https://m.stacker.news/46302

10 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b OP 17 Aug

It looks like it's charging SN to open a channel, but it might also be poor support for msats in lnbits. We are trying to pay you 2,762 sats and it wants us to pay 27,878 sats.

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @fed 17 Aug

Shouldn't be a channel charge, that phoenixd instance got plenty inbound liquidity. Weird, it's like the invoice further multiplies the sats by a thousand before charging.

103 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 17 Aug

It looks like lnbits doesn't support msats: https://github.com/lnbits/lnbits/issues/2009

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 17 Aug

The price needs to go higher for enough people to care about msats, lol

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 17 Aug

I know, but the lightning specs are all in msats, so all these non-msat APIs will have to be rewritten eventually, and it's weird to have APIs acting like they're receiving direct user input.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 18 Aug

I've submitted a fix that doesn't use msats with lnbits. Let me know if that finally does the trick.

1057 sats \ 1 reply \ @fed 18 Aug

I can confirm, auto withdrawal worked now. Thanks!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 18 Aug

Thanks for your patience/help troubleshooting!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 17 Aug

It'd be a pretty obvious msats/sats confusion if it were 1000x as much, but maybe it's doing something else funky. It works fine in our testing with lnd, but maybe phoenixd doesn't like msats.

I'll review this deeply tomorrow and see if there's something we can do.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @fed 17 Aug

deleted by author