52 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 27 Aug
Bitcoin's relative share is slightly down, but lightning's is up!
https://m.stacker.news/48502 | https://m.stacker.news/48503 |
|---|
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @notgeld OP 28 Aug
I could see a clear uptick of Bitcoin as MOE in the form of Lightning. Besides, LN makes the smallest payments on average among other tokens, including stablecoins.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca 28 Aug
Depressing stats for LN tbh
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @aoeu 28 Aug
I have never used Bitrefill because of the promotion of crypto. I have used Fold and Bitcoin Co. Am I missing out on anything with Bitrefill that I can't get with the other more bitcoin-focused ones?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @notgeld OP 28 Aug
I have used it only once. They also demand a quite low rate for sats.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @OT 28 Aug
I don't know why lightning doesn't have a bigger user base yet.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @notgeld OP 28 Aug
Let's invite head of marketing department of Lightning. Oh, wait
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca 28 Aug
It has horrible onboarding
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Aug
because people are stupid
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ca 28 Aug
The LN experience sucks for now
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Aug
yes, for not knowledgeable and lazy people.
https://m.stacker.news/48612
All those that do not start now to learn more about how to use LN, will pay a high price later. In other words: LOSERS.reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ca 28 Aug
spoiler alert: it NEEDS to be great exactly for lazy people. The best product wins. The best products cater to the lazy ones.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @notgeld OP 28 Aug
We have some promising tech to make it possible.
It is gonna be better.
reply