446 sats \ 5 replies \ @TheMorningStar 16 Sep \ on: Meme Monday - Best Bitcoin Meme Gets 10,000 Sats meta
Hardly call it invincible. It works and that's good enough. My point was not to overhaul the rewards mechanism but for the community to not tolerate clear abusers and where possible counteract their behavior. The debate was not about changing the algo it was about the perception of valued activity on SN.
reply
Surely, I understood your point. It was I who first noticed that unusual activity #675565 and informed. I was unsatisfied because someone with 500 sats zap came in top 5 and I was even out of 40 while I zapped double than him. The invincibility that I think comes not from the SN Algo but it's we as stackers make it invincible. After, I noticed I saw others also noticed and we're now more aware about if so eonw wants to game. Whether that stacker is a gamer or not is still questionable. He's even today at 10th rank.
reply
Great. Thanks for clarifying your thought process. I wanted to ensure to clarify mine as well as after I brought it up it seemed people were piling on a bit and that wasn't the intent. I don't have a better solution than the current algo to root out spam and reward good content so without a better idea I don't want to deride it.
reply
I also don't think it'd be best to deride it. It clearly is the best mechanism for many other valuable aspects.
I brought it up it seemed people were piling on a bit.
I think it's good if people just pile on it. If everyone does the same it's a fair game.
reply