pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 23 Sep \ parent \ on: Telegram's Privacy Mirage: Why You Should Stop Using It Now privacy
My impression was that Telegram did position itself very much in that way and that many (Bitcoiners esp) used it upon that misapprehension.
Consult this comparison and see how and why Tox is superior for privacy on all parameters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_instant_messaging_protocols
Proves my point further, it's all bullshit and so is everyone recommending something
You can't even defend tox, very lazy to give me a Wikipedia link... But I expect it because all privacy products are BS. Recommending something niche you don't understand is just another virtue signal recommendation.
reply
Toxes truly decentralised nature is the key. No other chat service matches it on all the parameters provided in the wikipedia comparitive analysis.
I gave you the link to the wikipedia comparison as you clearly are resistant/cynical about what I and others are saying so if you want you can consult that more neutral third party for their independent assessment which clearly shows Tox is superior for privacy.
If you primarily want privacy Tox is the way to go.
reply
No it isn't, it's prone to metadata leakage like everything else. Nostr is equally decentralized.
Why do you recommend it despite these facts?
reply
Tox excels on all metrics given in the independent wikipedia comparison.
I recommend it because of the above and it is truly decentralised non profit and free to use with no advertising or corporate sponsors.
There is no equal in terms of Toxes ethos, privacy, efficacy, cost effectiveness and integrity.
reply
AI response? Sad!
reply