pull down to refresh
20 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Sep \ parent \ on: The Daily Zap — Latest News and Updates alter_native
They aren't state employee's, so they have to negotiate with the various port operators. I'm not actually sure how all that works.
Then the state should put pressure on the port operators to take this matter as priority and make menda with the workers.
reply
I'm sure they are (although I disagree that they should). A massive supply chain disruption would be disastrous for Kamala's campaign.
reply
Yes, I agree. It would be disastrous for Kamala's campaign which is running on high as per MSM.
Either way, to whom these labour Unions are gonna vote according to you?
reply
For the first time I can remember, the Teamsters Union (one of the biggest labor unions) didn't endorse the Democrat candidate. My understanding is that their members overwhelmingly support Trump.
My guess would be that most union members will support Trump, but most union leadership will either endorse Kamala or abstain from making endorsements.
reply
Seems like Trump is ahead in the race right now?
Although US elections are much more complicated. The popular votes and the others, there's too much to explore. I'm enjoying learning a lot about US these days.
The post under history is an example of new learning for me. "Brokered conventions". But they aren't popular now.
reply
They like to pretend to let public have a say. This year was something of an exception, since the Democrats canceled their primary process and just appointed Kamala to the ticket. It probably was something like a brokered convention, in essence.
reply
I disagree. It wasn't at all the brokered convention. It was a plot created by Obama and Clinton lobby.
reply
I know, but that's essentially what brokered conventions were. I know this didn't follow the same formalisms, but that stuff's mostly for show.