pull down to refresh

38 sats \ 11 replies \ @k00b 9 Oct \ on: Stacker Saloon
At least plagiarized writing is good. Kids these days.
write
preview
213 sats \ 6 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 9 Oct
When I was teaching, you could put it through Grammarly and catch them red-handed at it. Now, with AI you have to read it yourself to catch the plagiarism. You also can catch a lot of bogusness. For some reason AI just does not come through as completely human.
reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 9 Oct
At the moment I think that is a critical almost feature of AI in that students do not realize that AI makes mistakes so you can catch it. If it was fool proof we would be in a world of hurt!
reply
5 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 9 Oct
They have good AI detection tools. They’re expensive though.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 9 Oct
I didn’t know what the oost was. I was teaching at a college where they provided the tool for teachers and students for using as a grammar and citation checking program. However, the teacher’s version had a plagiarism checker, too. I think there must have been a massive database for articles and books to pull this off.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 9 Oct
What AI tools are you talking about? As someone trying to work on legislation over it I’d love to know! From what I have heard even the “good” ones are big hit or miss
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 9 Oct
There are a few, but this one is used by publishers.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 9 Oct
Thank you! I will check it out in the morning!
reply
24 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cje95 9 Oct
lol what caused you to say this?!? Catch someone using AI?
reply
43 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 9 Oct
Bingo :)
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 9 Oct
lol victoryyyyyy!!!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 9 Oct
Yep, humans still have good discernment and discrimination.
reply