pull down to refresh

I may start doing book recommendations. @siggy47's post #716498 sparked a thought that reminded me of this book.
Arthur Herman writes great history books that focus on key years in history. His books read more like a story than a boring series of facts. They include many snippets from the time and less of the author's opinions. This book specifically is a snapshot into two pivotal and terrible men that set up so much death and destruction. So many of our issues today stem from these two men. Wilson is arguably the worst President the US has ever had, but that isn't the focus of this book.
In 1917, Arthur Herman examines one crucial year and the two figures at its center who would set the course of modern world history: Woodrow Wilson and Vladimir Lenin. Though they were men of very different backgrounds and experiences, Herman reveals how Wilson and Lenin were very much alike. Both rose to supreme power, one through a democratic election; the other through violent revolution. Both transformed their countries by the policies they implemented, and the crucial decisions they made. Woodrow Wilson, a champion of democracy, capitalism, and the international order, steered America's involvement in World War I. Lenin, a communist revolutionary and advocate for the proletariat, lead the Bolsheviks' overthrow of Russia's earlier democratic revolution that toppled the Czar, and the establishment of a totalitarian Soviet Union.Men of opposing ideals and actions, each was idolized by millions-and vilified and feared by millions more. Though they would never meet, these two world leaders came to see in the other the evils of the world each sought to eradicate. In so doing, both would unleash the forces that still dominate our world, and that continue to shape its future from nationalism and Communism to today's maps of the Middle East, Asia, and Eastern Europe. In this incisive, fast-paced history, Herman brilliantly explores the birth of a potent rivalry between two men who rewrote the rules of geopolitics-and the moment, one hundred years ago, when our contemporary world began.
~ Goodreads
Bolshevik revolution would not have succeeded without the First World War.
If a ceasefire was reached in 1916 Lenin would have failed.
Ukraine and Israel need to understand that no ceasefire today will make the world more dangerous in the future
reply
100%
De-escalation doesn't mean you trust the other side. Just that you are trying to reverse the direction.
reply
Yes, but we have to go deeper into the story. When the liberals overthrew the aristocracy, exterminating the rights of blood and adopting the free market, what we call capitalism today, currents of thought followed that culminated in these two figures mentioned. Communism is utopian within the capitalist world, and capitalism causes several problems that we cannot ignore, such as whoever has more capital will always have more power, that is a fact.
reply