I saw @ek bring up the idea of “zen mode” in @DesertDave ~alter_native post #720155
And so because of what I learned from @k00b and @DarthCoin in my controversial ~meta post #716073 I decided to zap this post 1000 sats to cast 3 votes.
This post has only been up 54min. It’s by a top stacker @ek. I haven’t even read the post. My goal is to just disappoint @grayruby and see if I can have fun gaming the system.
Something something @Undisciplined :P
No but really I actually might like the content in the ~meta territory most!
It will actually be an interesting experiment to see how long you can remain near the top of the leaderboard with one large zap.
reply
71 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 12 Oct
You just inspired me that it would be cool to have a time series chart of the leaderboard positions.
reply
The rollercoaster. So it’s not just a snapshot but you can watch @realBitcoinDog and @grayruby jockey for position as leaders of Stacker News!
Call it: “@Darthcoin Deplorables”
reply
Again seems that you do not get it 100%. It doesn't matter if you zap 1000 sats and the post get 3 votes or 1 vote. What you see as "top" is not the same as I see the "top".
Also if you zap a post in a territory that I mute it, I will not see it at all. But you see it as "top".
All this is just a game of sats. And I will repeat: spend your sats wisely.. Many people will remember my words in few years. I've been through these kind of games of "earning sats" in the early years of Bitcoin... Every satoshi count and when you spend it you must think twice for what you spend it.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 12 Oct
What you see as "top" is not the same as I see the "top".
Only hot is personalized, top is the same for everyone since a while
reply
not if I mute several territories And most of the time I use "recent" not top of hot.
reply