pull down to refresh

revisiting Stanford Prison experimentwww.youtube.com/watch?v=KND_bBDE8RQ
75 sats \ 13 comments \ @zapsammy 13 Oct Politics_And_Law
fascinating experiment that happened in [drum roll] 1971.
prior post referencing the experiment page: #46456
from everything i have been learning the following is probably true: the elite parasites of this world are masterminds of psychology and have specific objectives for these experiments (and the public judicial trials).
it goes something like this: "let us find out how people react to dominators, actions of dominators, and what they think about the dominators and their victims." the results of the public opinion polls can guide how fast and how hard further enslavement may proceed, and what are the necessary next steps to implement.
mark passio said in one of his rants "if you think that people are inherently evil or inherently good as they come out of the womb, you are my enemy!" i had to think long and hard about that statement, and ultimately agreed that human minds are programmable.
what do stackers think? are we living in a world-wide prison experiment?
write
preview
related posts
31 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 13 Oct
I don’t what’s in the video but this study afaik has never been reproduced (that is, attempts to reproduce the result have failed) and is treated as if it’s discredited. It’s very provocative idea though (which is why it’s probably so popular in culture).
reply
13 sats \ 1 reply \ @zapsammy OP 13 Oct
absolutely, many of these are fake, but are portrayed as the model for understanding of human behavior. the experiments are not important - the narrative is important. what's worse, the engineers of societies are attempting to prove that they are correct, and will go to great lengths to prove a point.
the year of the study alone (1971) should raise suspicion.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rebel_nomad 13 Oct
I wonder if it would be reproducible now, we're in an environment that is much closer to 1971 than 1990...
reply
58 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 13 Oct
There are great swaths of science, especially in the social sciences areas and some of the medical areas, that have been passed through the peer-review process that cannot be duplicated. Some experiments have been rerun tens of times with no reproductions of results. Lately, some of the medical and scientific journals have been retracting peer-reviewed studies because of faked data and bogus descriptions of results. Even the once sacrosanct “Nature” and “Lancet” have been having these problems and retracting many papers. Are you ready to give up the peer-review process and only rely on duplication of results in science? After all it is not The ScienceTM.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @zapsammy OP 13 Oct
Are you ready to give up the peer-review process and only rely on duplication of results in science?
we have stacker.news science territory =) perhaps one day we'll have legit stackers post their own natural science experiments.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 13 Oct
That would be interesting.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @rebel_nomad 13 Oct
Seems to me that we're living it full time these days... Especially the wider context of the experiment itself!
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 13 Oct
Ever since I took the obligatory Psych course that had the Stanford Experiment as part of the course, I have had niggling doubts about the conclusions. I never thought that “just anybody” “without specific reason” would turn into a monster under most conditions. It turns out that the guards did have an instruction and an incentive to get brutal with the prisoners. The replayed experiment seemed much more reasonable and concurring with my observations of people everywhere. Do you think that WWII had much influence on the experimental design of the original Stanford Experiment? I do.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @rebel_nomad 13 Oct
That's a good point!
Its not easy to map out all the influences on oneself, so that real knowledge can be revealed, especially if you're in an academic setting...
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @zapsammy OP 13 Oct
Do you think that WWII had much influence on the experimental design of the original Stanford Experiment?
the evil master psychologists are really good at manipulating people's minds. the occult thought-shapers are equipped with knowledge that goes back thousands of years. the average person's mind is shaped by examples from history and even local news that sound reasonable on the surface, get reinforced by media/friends/public, but fail to hold true when scrutinized closely. Asch Conformity experiment (u are of course familiar): https://youtu.be/TYIh4MkcfJA
anyways, we have to become master psychologists ourselves, perfect the true message in private, and propagate the message (as memes) unto the public.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 13 Oct
I was thinking of the recency of WWII and the “Nazis” that are the boogeymen of that era. Milgram was another experimenter who tried to figure out why everyday people would turn into “genocidal maniacs”. Again, the results were non-reproducible in that form. I am aware of the occultists’ grip on populations that are still somnambulists. Unfortunately, there are a lot of NPCs out there walking around.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @zapsammy OP 13 Oct
the mind control is strong.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 13 Oct
Yes, and the minds are very weak due to continuous attacks by the educational institutes.
reply