68 sats \ 16 replies \ @OneOneSeven 18 Oct \ parent \ on: Optimal Zapping on Stacker News meta
I'm still kicking myself this week for not downzapping a post that I probably should've when I first saw it pop up.
Normally I wouldn't care much but it got like 25k sats for just copy-pasting to SN with nice looking markdown, and none were forwarded to the author, who is on SN.
Which post was that?
I kick myself all the time about posts.
There are some people I know that are sat farming, but if everyone gives them a few sats, their posts rise.
So....that means his posts are relevant, right?
Or is everyone giving sats because of the algorithm?
reply
Dang, that's pretty egregious.
I think posts like that do need to be called out. I've seen people call them out in the comments and in the saloon.
I'm really bad at catching stuff like that, but I'll downzap 'em hard if someone else catches it.
reply
Im slow at catching that kind of stuff, too.
I feel I know a certain crowd of people here, all the newcomers and stuff, I am a bit reserved about.
reply
Sort by top posts -> zaprank -> for the week, and test yourself, see if you can spot the one I'm talking about.
reply
MoE vs SoV False Dichotomy?
reply
If this :
This was originally posted on Medium and republished by Bitcoin Magazine.
was at the top of the post, it probably wouldn't have received as many sats without a forward to @roy.
Maybe they didn't know about forwarding, but I did just leave a comment to remind them.
reply
reply
Yes, even if they do have "defi" in their bio lol.
reply
I saw that Roy had the top comment. That seems to basically be a stamp of approval.
I agree that it would have been better form to forward some sats, but also Roy could have posted his work here.
reply
reply
Good, glad I didn’t downzap then.
Great work btw.