pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 7 replies \ @EverythingSatsoshi OP 18 Oct \ parent \ on: LNhance LAUNCHES WEBSITE🎊🎊🎊 (THE GREATEST OF SOFT FORKS) bitcoin
@moonsettler thoughts on @justin_shocknet thinking this is FUD
Also @justin_shocknet what do you think about the Vault setup?
Justin is too deranged to debate with. and he is not equipped to handle a technical debate anyhow. so i don't feel the need to bother with addressing his claims.
reply
technical debate
That's the last thing you want because I see through your bullshit. #729559
You're pushing to abstract away real Bitcoin via a single UTXO consensus system for "virtualizing" transactions. That means either you're the deranged one, or more likely, just another scammer shilling yet another worthless sidechain like anyone who's been around has seen countless times before. You're twist on it is pretending its not a sidechain.
GFY.
reply
thank you for proving my point!
reply
The features and efficiencies that CTV can bring to vaults are huge not to mention being able to create even bigger arks.
reply
The vault use-case is meant to sound harmless, but seems more of a Hegelian dialectic for covenants and outsourcing security. If locktimes and multisig are inadequate for ones storage needs then no added scripting nonsense is going to help.
reply
again, thanks for demonstrating my point!
for the audience: you get better security better inheritance clauses and better backup schemes with CTV, and without losing any sovereignty or exposing yourself to third party / threshold risks. that's the whole point.
reply
No one cares, multisig and locks work fine
You're just backpedaling from your fake L2 scaling scam, ethtard
reply