reply on: How does it make sense to zap a post or comment with just 1 sat? \ stacker news ~AskSN

pull down to refresh

53 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 19 Oct \ on: How does it make sense to zap a post or comment with just 1 sat? AskSN

I agree. I think 10 sats should be the minimum zap otherwise why bother.

Why not just let people do what they want?

The only possible issue here is spamming mentions. But a filter for small value zaps fixes that just fine.

On the receiver size, a 1sat payment is genuinely worth 1sat; Lightning doesn't have anything similar to the dust UTXO issue that on-chain Bitcoin has. Sure, sending 1sat is costly in terms of fees. But so what? It's the sender's money.

(Obviously I'm talking about external wallets here as the stacker.news custodial wallet is going away)

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Taft OP 19 Oct

And why you don't let us say whatever we want?

No one is forcing people to do something they don't want. We are just expressing our thoughts.

99 sats \ 0 replies \ @oliverweiss 20 Oct

Why so salty? Is he preventing you from saying what you want? OMG

61 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 19 Oct

Bingo!! Outwitted Todd.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 19 Oct

Of course they can do what they want. Doesn't mean I don't think it is a pointless activity. I didn't mean minimum zap as a technically enforced rule. I just meant as common practice.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 22 Oct

You are not in hiding lol

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 20 Oct

I think I agree with this sentiment but the brand new stackers might want to keep it super skimpy until they get some reputation and zaps