53 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 19 Oct \ on: How does it make sense to zap a post or comment with just 1 sat? AskSN
I agree. I think 10 sats should be the minimum zap otherwise why bother.
write
preview
42 sats \ 5 replies \ @petertodd 19 Oct
Why not just let people do what they want?
The only possible issue here is spamming mentions. But a filter for small value zaps fixes that just fine.
On the receiver size, a 1sat payment is genuinely worth 1sat; Lightning doesn't have anything similar to the dust UTXO issue that on-chain Bitcoin has. Sure, sending 1sat is costly in terms of fees. But so what? It's the sender's money.
(Obviously I'm talking about external wallets here as the stacker.news custodial wallet is going away)
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Taft OP 19 Oct
And why you don't let us say whatever we want?
No one is forcing people to do something they don't want. We are just expressing our thoughts.
reply
99 sats \ 0 replies \ @oliverweiss 20 Oct
Why so salty? Is he preventing you from saying what you want? OMG
reply
61 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 19 Oct
Bingo!! Outwitted Todd.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 19 Oct
Of course they can do what they want. Doesn't mean I don't think it is a pointless activity. I didn't mean minimum zap as a technically enforced rule. I just meant as common practice.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 5h
You are not in hiding lol
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 20 Oct
I think I agree with this sentiment but the brand new stackers might want to keep it super skimpy until they get some reputation and zaps
reply