64 sats \ 3 replies \ @justin_shocknet 20 Oct \ on: The Distributional Consequences Of Bitcoin bitcoin
It's not an assault, it's capitulation.
What is the motivation for such a paper? It's not going to persuade anyone, you're either already for Bitcoin, or you drink the blood go along with deep-state narratives already. Given that, does anyone really think they wrote this for the fence-sitters?
we analyse in this paper the impact of a Bitcoin-positive scenario
Because there's no other scenario left. This is meant to be read between the lines, its a manual for the blood-drinkers to understand what's coming, and how to survive to fight another day.
This is what Bitcoin's gametheory playing out looks like, our enemies capitulating without admitting it.
write
preview
117 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 OP 20 Oct
When I was reading it I really felt a sense of fear. I am concerned that the only weapons left for them involve violence. When you corner a dog it will bite.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 20 Oct
Oh definitely
How do you capture a very dangerous animal? Do you attack it from the front? Do you walk through the front door? Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?
The WW3 setup, patently fake elections, and Bitcoin's game theory are all related.
The shadow war is bound to only get hotter from here.
I'm actually surprised there hasn't been more October spice, but I doubt we get through Nov 5 under current headlines. News cycle is due for a hard reset.
Nuke scare? Cyber pandemic? Bank holidays?
Don't know what it will look like, or if the can gets kicked till January, but the pantry is full of popcorn.
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 20 Oct
I have my almonds roasting.
reply