This feels a bit outdated. More than 95% of the hashrate has adopted a full-RBF policy. Full-RBF in this context means that even transaction replacements are accepted for all transactions whether they signaled replaceability or not. More crucially, a replacement transaction has to both pay a higher feerate and a higher absolute fee than the original transaction to get accepted, which might be an interesting point to cover in a future explainer.
Thanks for the context! I’ll put together an explainer on this later this week
reply